|  | 
| Alan Wilder of Recoil | 
Alan Wilder's Recoil will be performing at San Francisco's Mezzanine on October 21st and graciously took time out of his busy schedule to answer a few questions for SFBAC.
Get your tickets while they're still available here.
For those of you not already familiar with Alan Wilder, Alan was nearly a founding member of Depeche Mode, replacing Vincent Clarke in 1982 who went on to form Yaz and Erasure. Alan was an integral component of DM's signature sound and ultimately left the band in 1995. In the late 80's and in his spare time between DM albums and tours, Alan began to compose his solo material under the name, Recoil.
With that as some background, let's get to the interview!
On San Francisco / Touring: 
SFBAC:  We're  looking forward to your performance at the Mezzanine in San Francisco  on October 21st, do you have any favorite stories from previous time  spent in the city?
AW: Nothing immediately comes to mind apart from certain late night  activities which I couldn’t possibly mention in an interview!  Apart  from the touring, I have visited as a tourist on several occasions and I  do remember plenty of enjoyable times just wandering around the city.   There are so many cool areas, great restaurants and so on.  I’d say SF  is easily my favourite city on the west side of America.  It seems to  possess more of a European flavour compared to other west coast cities.   Previous shows with DM were always great (but we were generally spoilt  with receptive audiences everywhere in California).  
SFBAC: Do you prefer performing in large venues or smaller, more intimate settings like the Mezzanine (ie. capacity 1000)?
AW: With Recoil, I have enjoyed being nearer to the audience, being able to  actually see people’s expressions.  With DM one felt very removed at  times, enveloped within a huge production which almost seemed to run  itself at times.  I did enjoy those shows though - I mean how could you  not playing to so many people, with the power of those massive events? 
SFBAC: Of all the places you've toured in the past, what cities stand out and why?
AW: At the risk of sounding patronising, usually the more ‘rock ‘n’  roll-deprived’ places garner the most vociferous reactions. If you  combine that with say a Latin temperament, then you get amazing  response.  I think the best ever crowd I experienced was in Santiago ’94  during ‘the ‘Devotional’ tour.  Also the Mexicans are always  incredible. Russian audiences and people from other ex-iron curtain  countries are always extremely enthusiastic.  The legacy of these  country’s histories still effects the mentality today.  I’d say on this  recent Recoil tour, the best crowds were in Mexico City, Moscow,  Budapest, Bucharest, Prague, Lodz, Barcelona, Berlin and Paris.
SFBAC: Do you find it challenging translating studio material for the live  environment? Can you describe what gear you'll use onstage during the  tour? 
AW: It’s a challenge I really enjoy - trying to imagine how the music would  work in a venue at loud volume where the listener is in a completely  different frame of mind than at home or with headphones - maybe ready to  dance with a drink in their hand.  Using mainly laptops, a synth for  filtering and live effects, we have tried to pair back the music and  tailor it with these thoughts in mind.  I used to do the same job  preparing the Mode live versions and, in some ways, I found this work  much more creative than actually going out and playing on stage. 
SFBAC: What can fans expect during the 'Selected' tour? 
AW: The events are not so much ‘live’ band but more art installation.  Paul  Kendall and I have just extended what we do in the studio into the live setting  where we add spontaneous effects and extra parts to a pre-prepared  bedrock.  As I alluded to above, the music is comprised of stripped  down, edited sections from many Recoil remixes and alternative versions,  combined so that what we end up with is recognizably Recoil but doesn't  necessarily sound like what you hear on the studio versions.  We have  some flexibility to tailor the sound for each venue but we are also tied  in to a continuous film which accompanies everything. 
In  fact, this film element is what swung it for me to take the plunge with  these events. With the advent of cheaper, portable HD cameras as well  as affordable editing software, making films has suddenly become viable.  I spent the first 3 months of the year collaborating with 4 different  directors for this project using a central server where we could all  upload (and feedback on) our work-in-progress.
SFBAC: You've had a number of guests perform with you already during this  tour, do you have any surprises lined-up for the SF show? 
AW: At this time, we are working on various possibilities - keep an eye on  the Recoil forums for details. We definitely already have Architect and  Conjure One as extra acts for the evening.  We also hope to host an  after-show DM/Recoil party and I will be around to sign items, meet with  people and so on.
On recording:
SFBAC: Can you describe how your writing/recording process has evolved over  the years just as technology and software has evolved? 
AW: I have always struggled to write songs in the conventional way.  Lyrics  don’t come naturally to me so my process has always been a bit  different.  I guess ever since the advent of the first samplers I have  been fascinated with looping performances and trying to turn those into  something which occasionally (if I’m lucky) forms a new piece or a  song.  I guess the technology has helped with certain tools greatly  increasing the potential of those experiments.  Being a perfectionist  however does tend to slow me down in that I like to explore every avenue  before committing.  And there are so many possibilities these days.
SFBAC: What's your favorite gear within your home studio? 
AW: My needs are quite simple these days.  Logic Audio, Ableton Live,  plenty of plug-ins.  I just bought a MacBook Pro so I’m much more  portable these days, finally making music on the move (at least  sometimes).  In the studio, I love my 1970‘s Neve console, Roland space  echo, Manley amps and compressor, VCS 3, Minimoog and Oberheim synths,  and that’s about it.  I have plenty of other gear but it’s largely  redundant.
SFBAC: Do you have a theme or sound in mind before you start searching for a  sample? For example, how did you decide to use Bukka White’s “Shake ‘em  On Down” for your earlier single, ‘Electro Blues of Bukka White’? 
AW: Usually I just get a vague notion for a starting point and start  listening out for possible sounds to loop.  Hopefully (but not always)  that will inspire me to add something else and an atmosphere starts to  emerge.  It’s trial and error and I’m looking for ‘happy accidents’  which will suggest overall direction.  From there, I can more  efficiently put a picture together although the process often takes  unexpected twists and turns.  In fact, these are the moments I crave -  when one so-called sound accident renders everything you’ve done up to  that point useless, because the new element is much better or sparks a  completely new and more exciting direction. In the case of Bukka, the  music just naturally took a blues direction with the chords, but with a  very electronic basis, and that’s when I started trawling through some  blues records to find something that fitted.
SFBAC: A few years ago, you wrote an editorial describing the shifting  landscape in the music industry due, in large part, to the  napsterization of music. Has there been any meaningful change within the  industry since you wrote that? 
AW:   Since then, there have been some marketing re-thinks for the better.  A  more tactile approach perhaps. We are seeing a return to higher quality  formats, collectible editions, vinyl and so on.  Mute have embraced the  idea of limited editions where everyone can benefit - the consumer who  gets total choice ranging from a simple download right through to the  most luxury items, the artist who can indulge all his creative whims,  and the Record company who can charge the appropriate price for each  product in order to make some profit - as long as they do not over  produce and get lumbered with expensive stock.  The music business is of  course one of the fastest mutating industries and one has to try to  understand why things adapt in the way they do. If the consumer isn’t  particularly passionate and wants free music (which now seems inevitable  amongst most listeners) then I’m not against the Spotify-type concept  for example where, in effect, the artist receives his payment via  advertisers.
SFBAC: Another topic you hit upon in your editorial was the notion of  decreasing audio fidelity, specifically MP3’s lossy format. Did you  entertain higher fidelity formats with this years release of ‘Selected’?  DVD-Audio? SACD?
AW: I spoke about formats and mastering techniques, the loudness war,  dynamically-reduced, over-compressed, souped up final products, spewed  out into the market place without much care or proper musical  consideration. This is more of a marketing-led problem rather than as a  result of poorly produced music.  There are many extremely well produced  pieces of music which do not deserve this careless dumbed down process  at the end of the chain. The problem occurs due to paranoia over the  attention span of the listener resulting in desperate measures in order  to gain that attention back. 
We  have DVD audio in the ‘Selected ’ box set.  This is higher bit rate than  CD.  If you listen to a Recoil release, it should sound clear and  dynamic, not necessarily (apparently) loud but a musical, enjoyable  experience.  If the listener wants to hear it loud, they can turn up the  volume on their amp - genius.   My suggestion? Step back, stop texting  and tweeting for a while, close your eyes and just listen.
’ box set.  This is higher bit rate than  CD.  If you listen to a Recoil release, it should sound clear and  dynamic, not necessarily (apparently) loud but a musical, enjoyable  experience.  If the listener wants to hear it loud, they can turn up the  volume on their amp - genius.   My suggestion? Step back, stop texting  and tweeting for a while, close your eyes and just listen.
Miscellaneous: 
SFBAC: When can we expect to hear new Recoil emerge? 
AW: Realistically, not before 2012.  My intention is to work on new  material after the tour and with all that goes into any release these  days, the turnaround time to get things released is quite long.  Plus  I’m quite a slow worker anyway! 
SFBAC: Can you envision a time where Recoil could tour with DM? 
AW: Hmm - cant see that one somehow. 
SFBAC: Looking back at your career with Depeche Mode, do you have any regrets about leaving at the time you did?
AW: No regrets.  For the most part, I enjoyed my time in the group but I  wanted to concentrate on other things and have been lucky enough to  continue doing what I love with little compromise along the way.  In  fact, much less compromise than when I was in DM.  I consider myself  very fortunate in that respect.
SFBAC: What DM album are you most proud of?
AW: ‘Songs of Faith & Devotion’ is my favourite, even though  paradoxically it was the most difficult to make.  Communication was very  poor between us all during that period and tensions ran high but, as is  so often the case, that kind of chemistry must have been instrumental  in helping to create some of the strongest material, such as ‘In Your  Room’, ‘Walking in my Shoes’, ‘I Feel You’ and so on.  Even though  ‘Violator’ was very successful, for me, it doesn't contain the depth and  looser feel that I love about ‘SOFAD’.
SFBAC: What are you currently listening to?
AW:   Currently, I am quite impressed by the last Gil Scott Heron album and  Architect.  I like some of the latest Massive Attack material (Hope  Sandoval, Martina Topley-Bird tracks).  I listen to many varied things  at different times depending on my mood.  Styles can range from avant  garde, blues, electronic, classical.  I have no rules really.   Unfortunately, due to a complicated life (which seems to get more so by  the day), I never find I have enough time to research and discover much  new music but I enjoy trawling through my catalogue, built up since I  was a teenager, and occasionally something new comes along to excite.
SFBAC: As a Douglas McCarthy fan, can we expect to hear more from him on future Recoil material?
AW: Possibly - it’s difficult to say until I have new material properly  underway.  I like to work intuitively which means that the musical  direction is a discovery process and somewhat unpredictable.  Only once I  have something established does it suggest who would be appropriate to  vocalise.
SFBAC: Of all the artists you’ve worked with over the years (remixing,  producing, collaborating, performing, etc.) who stands out and why?
AW: I’d say for sheer talent, Joe Richardson and Diamanda Galas.  Both were  easy to work with and exuded confidence (not arrogance).  Joe has this  incredible array of talent - he is a prolific songwriter, fantastic  guitarist & harmonica player and has a unique soulful blues voice.   It’s a dream for me to have someone like that at my disposal, especially  as he has a very open-minded attitude to recording techniques and  modern approaches.  Diamanda likewise is open and multi-talented.  In  both cases, you can just let them go, record everything they do and know  you will end up with a wealth of material to play around with. 
SFBAC: What artist(s) would you want to collaborate with in the future (who you haven't already worked with)?
AW: I’ve been missing Mark Hollis since he made those last three Talk Talk  albums. His voice would be a great match for some of the atmospheres I  like to make.  How sad that he doesn’t do anything any more.  Morrissey  would also be part of any Recoil dream team.  There’s Lisa Gerrard, Guy  Garvey - many singers actually that I like.
SFBAC: Alan, thanks so much for making the time for this interview and we're looking forward to seeing you in October!
  